Free Love in 1850s Petaluma

ONE WOMAN’S QUEST FOR LOVE ON HER OWN TERMS

Abigail Goodwin Haskell (Petaluma Historical Library & Museum)

In 1857, Abigail and Barnabus Haskell arrived in Petaluma pursuing a California dream of free love. It wasn’t quite the promiscuous Summer of Love that would inflame the Golden State a century later, but it did share with the era one irresistible attraction: a rebellion against authority. For the Haskells, the rebellion was over marriage.[1]

Under the yoke of traditional values and institutions back east, marriage was predominately a transactional affair. Traditionally arranged between families, there was little room for love or individual consent. Once married, a bride and her fortune became the property of her husband. Divorce was largely unheard of.[2]

Free lovers denounced it as “legitimized adultery.” They believed everyone should have the ability to choose a monogamous partner based solely on love, and to end the relationship once the love did.[3]

“Woman was not created to be the slave of man,” Abigail Haskell wrote. “She was to be his equal, to walk upright by his side in her native dignity and purity.”[4]

Barnabus and Abigail Haskell with son William, 1850 (Petlauma Historical Library & Museum)

Petaluma was still in early formation when the Haskells arrived. Founded during a potato boom in 1852 that quickly went bust, the local economy was rebounding thanks to California’s new wheat boom.[5] Abigail taught at private schools before being appointed principal of the town’s first public school. Barnabus, a hatter by trade, purchased a dry goods store on Main Street.[6]

The Brick School at 5th & B streets, build 1869 (Petlauma Historical Library & Museum)

Of Petaluma’s 1,300 residents at the time, 38% were women.[7] While women were largely relegated to the home back east—leaving men to engage in the public world of business and politics—California’s boom-and-bust cycles made such separate spheres challenging. Women burdened with dissolute or absent husbands found themselves having to work to support themselves and their children.

Recognizing their financial insecurity, state legislators passed legislation allowing women to independently own property, operate businesses, enter into contracts and lawsuits, and more easily file for divorce.[8] 

Those new rights coincided with advances in safer sex. Thanks to Charles Goodyear’s recent invention of vulcanized rubber, sales of condoms, douching syringes, and “womb veil” diaphragms were soaring. An array of “female medicines” for birth control, varying in effectiveness and safety, were also available from pharmacies, dry-goods stores, and mail-order catalogs.[9]

Female medicines in the mid-1800s (public domain)

As fertility rates began to plummet in the 1850s, divorce cases began to rise, with 70% of the plaintiffs being women.[10] Meanwhile, the women’s suffragist movement was gaining traction, having recently kicked off at the Seneca Falls Convention in upstate New York.

The movement evolved from an earlier 19th century evangelical crusade known as the Second Great Awakening.[11] Aimed at purifying society in preparation for Christ’s return, it was predominately composed of white, middle-class women. To exert their influence outside the home, they organized into socially acceptable prayer groups, and began calling for a range of social reforms, including temperance, abolition, children’s rights, and female emancipation.[12]

The Haskells converted to the crusade soon after their marriage in 1837, setting off from New York City with a small band of missionaries to establish a Baptist church in Galveston, Texas.[13] Returning to New York City a few years later, the couple joined the Swedenborgian Church, a Christian denomination inspired by the 18th century Swedish scientist, philosopher, and mystic Emanuel Swedenborg.

Emanuel Swedenborg (public domain)

Swedenborgians believed in marriage equality. They also believed in a divine love that pervaded and moved the material world, leaving one to follow either the path of self-love, which led ultimately to the realms of hell, or the path of love for others, which led to the heavens.[14] The path to the heavens attracted reformists like the Haskells.

But it was Swedenborg’s revelatory claims—particularly, the immortality of the soul after death—that had the greatest impact on American culture. His belief in the existence of an immaterial reality beyond reach of the human senses was buttressed with visions, trances, and dreams. He claimed to have conversed with spirits and angels on a daily basis.[15]

Those claims gave rise in the 1850s to a countercultural movement known as Spiritualism.[16]

It began when Maggie and Kate Fox, two teenage sisters in upstate New York, claimed to have heard “rappings” from the dead. Joined by their older sister Leah, they began staging public performances as trance mediums communicating with souls of the deceased, setting off a new national sensation.[17]

The Fox sisters, Leah, Kate, and Maggie (courtesy of Association of Religious Data Archives)

Despite its questionable legitimacy, Spiritualism filled a void left by traditional religion, which placed death at the periphery. At a time  when one child in every three died before age ten, and many women did not survive childbirth, Spiritualism provided a sense of solace and closure to many struggling with grief.[18] That included the Haskells, whose oldest child died when she was eight years old.[19]

(illustration from Frank Leslies Illustrated Weekly, April 2, 1887)

In Petaluma, the Haskells devoted themselves to the Swedenborgian doctrine of service to others, leading local groups calling for children’s rights, abolition, and temperance (shorthand for husbands who beat their wives and children, and spent their wages on drink).[20]Every summer, Barnabus returned to the east coast to attend the national Swedenborg convention.[21]

The couple also sought fellowship with a local group of Spiritualists who met at the Liberty Street home of Chester Hatch, operator of the town’s first foundry, and his wife Lucretia, a hospice nurse. Chester represented Sonoma County in the Spiritualists’ state conventions. The couple’s home gatherings often featured seances with visiting mediums.[22]

Petaluma spiritualist Lucretia Hatch (San Francisco Call, March 6, 1901)

During the bloodshed of the Civil War, Spiritualism’s popularity grew by an estimated two million followers.[23] The only religious sect to recognize the equality of women, it produced the first large group of female spiritual leaders—typically young, white, single, and Protestant—to address large public gatherings, free from the patriarchal environment of churches. Following the war, female mediums began migrating to California, where they became founding members of the state’s women’s suffragist movement.[24]

In December of 1869, Abigail called a meeting at her home to launch the Sonoma County Woman Suffrage Association. A few weeks later, she traveled to San Francisco with Lucretia Hatch and another local Swedenborgian, Sarah Myers Latimer, to attend the inaugural convention of the California Woman Suffrage Association. A big part of Abigail’s quest was securing equal access to higher education for women.[25] 

National Woman’s Suffrage Convention, 1870 (public domain)

At the convention, Abigail was elected the association’s first president, and Latimer one of her vice presidents.[26] The group’s first order of business was organizing a petition drive for a state referendum granting women the vote. A forceful and persuasive writer, Abigail, took to the newspapers to make her case.

Sarah Myers Latimer, founding vice-president, California Woman Suffrage Association (Petlauma Historical Library & Museum)

“Woman is declared inferior to man,” she wrote. “She has no voice in politics, government or law, and we see the sad, lamentable consequences. Brute force is acknowledged as the only power in the universe. Love, that love which the Lord enjoined upon his disciples, is trampled underfoot under the ruthless, iron heel of man-made civilization.”[27]

In March 1870, Abigail led a female delegation to Sacramento to address a select committee of the state legislature—the first women in California history to do so. She presented the committee with the suffrage petition signed by more than three thousand supporters, calling for a referendum to amend the state constitution granting women the vote.[28]

“We claim to be recognized as citizens of this free Republic!” she told legislators.[29] She also asked legislators to open up the new state university in Berkeley to women (the campus began enrolling women six months later).[30]

The referendum proposal was overwhelmingly defeated in the state assembly. California women would not be granted the vote until 1911.[31]

There were further setbacks. In 1873, Congress sought to curb the free love movement by passing the Comstock Law, which banned sending contraceptives through the mail, along with sex education, including information about sexually transmitted diseases. By 1880, most states had outlawed abortion.[32]

Free love advocate Victoria Woodhull depicted as “Mrs. Satan in parody of conservative pushback (Thomas Nast, Harper’s Weekly, February 17, 1872, Library of Congress)

“Woman suffrage in America is on the decline,” reported the Petaluma Courier in 1877, “and justly so. It has been agitated by a bad lot of harum-scarum women, who have mixed free-love, spiritualism, and all sorts of woman’s rights into a sort of political and social hotchpotch that has disgusted right-thinking people.”[33]

Abigail viewed such attacks as teaching moments, although she expressed disappointment that her opponents only had “trash and scurrility” to offer in their opposition. In 1879, she launched the Sonoma-Marin Women’s Christian Temperance Union as its founding president. It was to be her last reform effort. After a lingering illness, she died in 1884 at the age of 64. [34]

Abigail Goodwin Haskell (Petaluma Historical Library & Museum)

Placed in a white casket, Abigail was drawn by a team of white horses to the Cypress Hill Cemetery in a white hearse of white plumes and drapings. The pallbearers were all former students of hers.[35]

“Following the doctrines of the illustrious Swedenborg,” wrote Philip Cowen, a close friend and local bookstore owner, “death had no terror for a mind like hers, who, no doubt, never wronged any living being, hence she had no fear of an angry God, for with her, “God was love.”[36]


A version of this story appeared in the Petaluma Argus-Courier July 19, 2024.

******

FOOTNOTES:

[1] Ann Nisson, “Abby and Barney,” an unpublished biography of Abigail Haskell, Petaluma Historical Library & Museum.

[2] Carol Faulkner, Unfaithful: Love, Adultery, and Marriage Reform in Nineteenth-Century America (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2019), pp. 1-3; Ann Braude, Radical Spirits: Spiritualism and Women’s Rights in Nineteenth-Century America, Second Edition (Indiana University Press, 2001), p. 195.

[3] Faulkner, p. 1; Braude, p. 119.

[4] Nisson.

[5] Gaye LeBaron, “How Sonoma County Prized Potato Got its Start,” Santa Rosa Press Democrat, September 17, 2013; Adair Heig, History of Petaluma: A California River Town (Petaluma, CA: Scottwall Associates, 1982), pgs.69, 156; Robert A. Thompson, Historical and Descriptive Sketch of Sonoma County, California (Philadelphia: L.H. Everts & Co., 1877), pp. 24-25; James Gerber, “The Gold Rush Origins of California’s Wheat Economy,” http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1405-22532010000200002;.

[6] Ad announcing the Excelsior dry goods store now owned by Barnabus Haskell, Sonoma County Journal, December 25, 1857; Per Ann Nisson, from May 1856 or 1857 to April 1859, Abigail was employed at Miss Atkins Young Ladies Seminary in Benicia, teaching English, before beginning to teach in Petaluma; List of teachers, Sonoma County Journal, July 22, 1859; “The Closing of Our Public School,” Sonoma County Journal, December 28, 1860.

[7] Thompson, p. 56.

[8] Bonnie L. Ford, “Women, Marriage, and Divorce in California, 1849–1872,”  California Legal History, Vol. 16, 2021, pgs. 6-7, 10, 34.

[9] Halle Lieberman, “A Short History of the Condom,” JSTOR Daily, https://daily.jstor.org/short-history-of-the-condom/; “19th Century Artifacts: History of Birth Control,” Dittrick Medical History Center, Case Western Reserve University, https://artsci.case.edu/dittrick/online-exhibits/history-of-birth-control/contraception-in-america-1800-1900/19th-century-artifacts/

[10] Ford, p.11; Janet Farrell Brody, Contraception and Fertility Rates in Nineteenth Century America (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1994), pgs. ix-x, 2-3.

[11] Faye E. Duden, “Women’s Rights, Abolitionism, and Reform in Antebellum and Gilded Age America,” Oxford Research Encyclopedias, oxforedre.com. https://oxfordre.com/americanhistory/americanhistory/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199329175.001.0001/acrefore-9780199329175-e-20

[12] George M. Fredrickson, “The Coming of the Lord: The Northern Protestant Clergy and the Civil War Crisis,” in Miller, Randall M.; Stout, Harry S.; Wilson, Charles Reagan, eds. (1998). Religion and the American Civil War. Oxford University Press. pp. 110–30; Nancy Cott, “Young Women in the Second Great Awakening in New England,” Feminist Studies, Vol. 3 (1), 1975, pp. 15-16;Mary Ryan, “A Woman’s Awakening: Evangelical Religion and the Families of Utica, New York, 1800 to 1840,”American Quarterly, Vol. 30 (5), 1978, p. 619.

[13] Nisson; Benjamin Franklin Fuller, History of Texas Baptists (Louisville, KY: Baptist Book Company, 1900), p. 109.

[14] Emanuel Swedenborg, The Delights of Wisdom Pertaining to Marriage Love, 1768 (Rotch Edition. New York: Houghton, Mifflin and Company, 1907), in The Divine Revelation of the New Jerusalem (2012), n. 308; Olle Hjern, “The Influence of Emanuel Swedenborg in Scandinavia,” in Scribe of Heavenedited by Jonathan S. Rose, Stuart Shotwell, and Mary Lou Bertucci (West Chester, PA: Swedenborg Foundation, 2005), 157; “Swedenborg’s Cultural Influence,” Swedenborg Foundation, Swedenborg.com. https://swedenborg.com/emanuel-swedenborg/influence/

[15] Richard Lines, “Swedenborg and Spiritualism,” Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 69, 2005, 113–119; Richard Lines, Things Heard and Seen, the Newsletter of the Swedenborg Society, London, No. 1, (Spring 2000); “Swedenborg’s Cultural Influence,” Swedenborg Foundation, Swedenborg.com. https://swedenborg.com/emanuel-swedenborg/influence/

[16] “Swedenborg’s Cultural Influence,” Swedenborg Foundation, Swedenborg.com. https://swedenborg.com/emanuel-swedenborg/influence/

[17] Karen Abbott, “The Fox Sisters and the Rap on Spiritualism,” Smithsonian magazine, October 30, 2012; Braude, p. 2; Daniel Bowlin, “The American Phantasmagoria: The Rise of Spiritualism in Nineteenth-Century America,” Masters Thesis, Eastern Michigan University, 2019.

https://commons.emich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2369&context=theses

[18] Bowlin; “Swedenborg’s Cultural Influence,” Swedenborg Foundation, Swedenborg.com. https://swedenborg.com/emanuel-swedenborg/influence/

[19] Nisson.

[20] Barnabus led the local Sons of Temperance, and Abigail their ladies auxiliary (Ad, Petaluma Argus, January 14, 1862; “Card of Thanks,” Sonoma County Journal, July 8, 1859); Abigail also served as Worthy Chief Templar of the local Independent Organization of the Good Templars (IOGT), and as a board member of the local California Youth Association 1861 (Ad for IOGT, “Youth’s Association,” Petaluma Argus, November 12, 1861).

[21] Barnabus’ attendance at the annual conventions is documented from 1851 to 1871 in the Journal of the 35th-36th General Conventions of the New Church in the U.S, Journal of the 37th-46th General Conventions of the New Church in the U.S.

[22] “Courierlets,” Petaluma Courier, November 14, 1883; “State Convention of Spiritualists,” Petaluma Argus, June 7, 1866; “Death of Col. C.P. Hatch, Petaluma Courier, March 19, 1893; “Mrs. Lucretia Hatch,” Petaluma Courier, March 14, 1901; “Noted Spiritualist Dies,” San Francisco Call, March 5, 1901.

[23] Abbott.

[24] Braude, pgs. 2, 195.

[25] Nisson.

[26] “Woman Suffrage,” Petaluma Argus, January 8, 1870; “Woman, State Convention of Female Suffragists,” San Francisco Chronicle, January 28, 1870; “Woman Suffrage, Third Day of the State Convention,” San Francisco Chronicle, January 29, 1870;

[27] Nisson.

[28] The Suffrage Question,” Sacramento Bee, March 19, 1870; Theodore Henry Hittell, History of California, Volume 4 (San Francisco: N.J. Stone & Co., 1898), p. 435.

[29] Hittell, p. 435; “The Suffrage Question,” Sacramento Bee, March 19, 1870.

[30] Nisson; “They Have Done It,” Sacramento Bee, October 4, 1870.

[31] “Sacramento Correspondence,” San Francisco Examiner, March 23, 1870; “Woman Suffrage Carries by About 4,000,” San Francisco Call, October 12, 1911.

[32] “What to Know About the Comstock Act,” New York Times, May 16, 2023; “The History of Abortion Access in the U.S.,” Penn Today, University of Pennsylvania. https://penntoday.upenn.edu/news/penn-profs-weigh-history-abortion-access-us

[33] Petaluma Courier, September 13, 1877.

[34] Nisson; “Women’s Christian Union,” Petaluma Courier, November 12, 1879; “Courierlets,” Petaluma Courier, January 16, 1884.

[35] “Polly Larkin’s Pot-pourri,” Petaluma Courier, January 16, 1884.

[36] “In Memoriam,” Petaluma Argus, January 26, 1884.

Petaluma’s Spiritualist Leader

Lucretia A. Hatch’s death notice, San Francisco Call, March 6, 1901

Lucretia Ann Hatch came to California’s early suffrage movement through her involvement with Spiritualism. Born Lucretia Ann Newton in Massachusetts in 1816, she was married at the age of twenty-six to John O. Darrow in Boston. Of the couple’s four children, apparently only one, William, survived to adulthood. In 1851, Darrow left for the California gold rush, after which Lucretia apparently filed for divorce (a legal ambiguity that later resurfaced in her life).

In the late 1850s, Lucretia took William to California, where she joined her brother John Newton in Petaluma, where he settled in 1853 after coming west for the gold rush. One of Lucretia’s sisters, Mrs. Emma Baston, also lived in town.

In Petaluma, Lucretia met and married forty-seven year old Chester Payne Hatch (1814-1893). Born in Connecticut, Hatch, like the other men in Lucretia’s life, originally came to California to mine gold in 1853. A machinist by trade, he started a company in San Francisco manufacturing sashes, doors, and blinds. In 1857, he relocated his business to Petaluma, and two years later formed the town’s first foundry.

One interest Chester shared with Lucretia was Spiritualism, a religious movement that began in New England in 1849. Based on a premise that the living could communicate with spirits of the dead through a medium, Spiritualism became a therapeutic means of feeling connected to deceased family members, especially young children.

For a number of women, it also became a means of claiming some degree of independence outside the hierarchy of clergymen, particularly with respect to public speaking before mixed audiences, unrestrained by the principles of piety, purity, submissiveness, and domesticity imposed upon women during the Victorian Era.

After the Civil War, Spiritualism began to flower in California with the arrival of mediums—typically single, young, white, Protestant women—from New York or New England, looking to escape the yoke of traditional values and institutions back east.

Lucretia and Chester Hatch, like many Spiritualists, endorsed many of the progressive reforms of the mid-nineteenth century, including abolition and suffrage for women. The Hatch’s home on Liberty Street between Washington Street and Western Avenue became the site of regular Spiritualist gatherings, featuring seances with visiting mediums.

Home of Chester and Lucretia Hatch, Liberty Street between Western Avenue and Washington Street, Petaluma (Thompson 1877 Atlas)

In 1866, the Spiritualists organized to hold their first California State Convention in San Jose, which the couple attended. Chester was elected to the Spiritualists’ State Central Committee as the Sonoma County representative.

On December 28, 1869, Lucretia and Chester attended the first meeting of the Sonoma County Woman Suffrage Association held at the Petaluma home of Abigail Haskell. The next month, Lucretia accompanied fellow members Haskell and Sarah Myers Latimer—both members of the Swedenborg Church, which had an affiliation with Spiritualists—to San Francisco to attend the inaugural convention of the California Woman Suffrage Association. At the convention, Haskell was elected the new association’s first president, and Latimer a vice president.

While continuing to agitate for suffrage, Chester and Lucretia also became involved in the progressive circles of the Radical Republican Party. Chester became a prominent business and political leader in Petaluma and Lucretia volunteered as a hospice nurse for the terminally ill including, in her role as a Spiritualist, performing last rites.

After Chester passed away in 1893, Lucretia was subjected to a scandalous estate battle initiated by Chester’s brother in Connecticut, who charged Lucretia with bigamy for having married Chester without divorcing her first husband, and also with forging Chester’s final will, which named Lucretia as its main beneficiary.

Lucretia won the estate battle in court, restoring her reputation. She lived another seven years, passing away in 1901, at which time she was recognized in newspaper obituaries around the country as one of California’s early Spiritualist pioneers.

SOURCES:

Petaluma Argus: “A New Enterprise,” March 5, 1870; “Died,” March 28, 1873; “Republican Mass Meeting,” April 6, 1877; “Local Brevities,” July 30, 1880; “Personal and Social,” November 25, 1881; “Petaluma Foundry,” March 13, 1884; “John U. Newton,” September 10, 1887.

Petaluma Courier: “Courierlets,” November 14, 1883; “Death of Col. C.P. Hatch,” March 19, 1893; “Notice to Creditors,” January 3, 1894; “Mrs. Lucretia Hatch,” March 4, 1901; “Landmarks Are being Torn Down,” October 18, 1918.

San Francisco Call: “Noted Spiritualist Dies at Petaluma,” March 5, 1901.
San Francisco Examiner: “A Contested Estate,” April 1, 1893; “The Hatch Will Contested,” October 4, 1893.

San Francisco Chronicle: “His Legal Wife,” April 4, 1893.
“Chester P. Hatch,” History of Sonoma County (Alley, Bowen & Company, 1880), pp. 557-558.

Julia Schlesinger, Worker in the Vineyard: A Review of the Progress of Spiritualism, Biological Sketches, Lectures, Essays and Poems (San Francisco, By the Author, 1896).

Elizabeth Schleber Lowry, Invisible Hosts: Performing the Nineteenth Century Spirit Medium’s Autobiography (State University of New York, 2017).

Elizabeth Schleber Lowry, “Women in Nineteenth Century Spiritualism,” World Religion and Spirituality, website, wrldrels.org.

The Swedenborgian Suffragist Sarah Myers Latimer

Sarah Myers Rich Latimer

Born in 1826 in Lambertville, New Jersey, Sarah Myers Rich Latimer was the sixth child of Abraham Dillion Myers (1789-1872) and Martha Preston Gillingham (1788-1844). Shortly after losing her mother at the age of nineteen, Sarah married John Pennington Rich (1815-1862), a construction engineer, and moved with him on his various assignments around Massachusetts and ultimately to Portland, Maine, where she was introduced to the teachings of the Swedenborgian Church which would influence her life going forward.

Over the next fifteen years Sarah gave birth to three boys, one of whom died in infancy, and two girls. In 1862, the family sailed to California via the Isthmus of Panama route, where they settled on a 480-acre ranch of fruit trees, cattle, and mineral springs in town of Windsor, Sonoma County, adjacent to farms of Sarah’s father and brother, who had settled there in the mid-1850s. Sarah named the ranch Glen Valley Springs. Tragically, Sarah’s husband John died from malaria six months after their arrival, leaving Sarah to run the ranch.

In 1865, Sarah married thirty-five year old Lorenzo Dow Latimer (1830-1901), a Santa Rosa attorney, whose first two wives had died prematurely, each leaving him with a young child. A prominent leader of the Sonoma County Republican Party, he ran unsuccessfully for the state senate the year he married Sarah, followed by two unsuccessful campaigns for county judge. In December, 1869, he was appointed California’s U.S. District Attorney, a position based in San Francisco that he held for the next decade.

That same month, Sarah participated in the formation of the Sonoma County Woman Suffrage Association held at the Petaluma home of fellow Swedenborgian, Abigail Haskell. In late January, 1870, she accompanied Haskell to the inaugural convention of the California Woman Suffrage Association in San Francisco, where Haskell was elected president and Sarah vice president. Sarah also became an officer of the local chapter of the International Order of Good Templars, a national temperance organization promoting abstinence (a position she may have modified once she and Lorenzo added a large vineyard to their ranch).

In 1871, Sarah accompanied Haskell’s husband Barnabus, a prominent Petaluma dry good merchant, to Chicago on the new transcontinental railroad, to attend the annual Swedenborg Church convention. Barnabus had faithfully traveled to Chicago or to an east coast city to the convention ever summer since settling in Petaluma in the mid-1850s.

In 1880, Lorenzo was appointed to fill the eight-month term of the deceased Superior Court Judge of San Francisco, after which he maintained a law partnership in San Francisco until 1886. During the early years that Lorenzo worked in San Francisco, the couple commuted between Glen Valley Springs and the city, where Sarah remained engaged with the California Woman Suffrage Association, participated in philanthropic affairs, including the founding of the Hospital for Children, and served as a delegate to the national regional Swedenborgian conventions.

She also joined the board of the California Women’s Silk Culture Association, an initiative by women suffragists in the 1880s to foster the cultivation of mulberry trees and silk production as a means of providing work to unemployed women and children.

In 1878, Sarah returned full time to her ranch, which had grown to almost 1,000 acres, and converted it into a hot springs resort, which she managed with the help of her son William Rich. She passed away in 1904, a few years after her husband, surrounded by her family at Glen Valley Springs.

SOURCES:

Elinor Rich, Along Family Lines, the family history of the Rich Family, Windsor Museum & Historical Society.

Nelson Klose, “Sericulture in the United States,” Agricultural History Vol. 37, No. 4 (Oct. 1963) pp. 225-234.

Annual Report of the Women’s Silk Culture Association of the United States, Volume 3 (Philadelphia, April, 1883).

Journals of 37th-46th General Conventions of the New Jerusalem: General convention of the Church of New Jerusalem (Swedenborg Church) in Chicago, June 9-13, 1871.

New Church Messenger, Vol. 88, 1904, “Latimer,” p. 211.

Oakland Tribune: November 17, 1886.

Petaluma Argus: “Appointed,” December 18, 1869; May 14, 1870.

Petaluma Argus-Courier: “The Death of William B. Rich,” April 27, 1933.

Petaluma Courier: May 19, 1880: “Former Local Woman Dead,” January 29, 1925.

Sacramento Bee: “Deaths,” February 20, 1858; “Marriages,” November 27, 1860; “Deaths,” October 8, 1864; “State, County, and City Officers,” December 24, 1880.

San Francisco Call: “Swedenborgian Church,” October 13, 1895.

San Francisco Chronicle, “Hospital for Children,”, January 13, 1887.

San Francisco Examiner: “ The City’s Vote,” November 5, 1880; Ad, March 9, 1881; “Silk Culture,” January 21, 1882; “The Juice of the Grape,” January 11, 1887.

Santa Rosa Republican: “Death of Mrs. Latimer,” March 9, 1904.

Sonoma Democrat: March 31, 1859.